TN BJP's New Game Plan

Or, should I say, the new game plan of the ex-servants and beneficiaries of the Nagarathar-Vellalar (Dravidian) movement. One hundred years is too long for anything. Tamils are desperate for change, it seems. This drama is stretching on too much. After its over, you're going nowhere. After this, life goes in reverse for tamils. Your hate is going to descend on you tenfold, no matter where in the world you are. (Post is slightly long, but important for tam-brahms)

" 'கடவுள்'னா நா இயற்கையை சொல்றேன்" (By 'God', I mean nature)- Senior Journalist Mani. ப்பா room போட்டு யோசிச்சிருப்பான் போலிருக்கு. What an intellectual. Amazed. This is just 'atheism' for now, and is Ok. It only begins to get outrageous when it becomes the 'கடவுள் மறுப்பு' (denial-of-god) of chettiar-mudaliar-pillai (dravidian) movement.

Apparently, the event, or, the turn of events that caused this outburst was...The new TN BJP head Annamalai Kuppusamy apparently said that TN BJP will soon 'discpline' the media in TN and teach them good manners or something like that. To quote Mani, Annamalai said "Media will soon be in our hands, and *this is why L. Murugan has been appointed as minister of broadcast/telecom*."

Tactless, of course.

Mani then rants and laments about how BJP has mutilated the media in India, and this is a problem not only in TN, but all over the country. Kinda agree with it.

This is the background. Some of my thoughts on this. My post about the outer global political tectonic shifts within which #drav happened was written at the time Annamalai entered TN BJP. My 6th sense is in good shape. The pact between goundans and BJP kinda stares you in the face. Konars, don't know, for now. There were whispers that sathankulam incident was konars vs nadars. I thought nadars were cozy in TN BJP/RSS.

SILF, TN INC, DMK, TN BJP...they have a history of biting the hand that feeds them. Wouldn't blame them. If they fall, they fall on dalits. They need to do anything and everything to stay up. Until later part of 20th century, nadars and vanniyars, the chief slaves of the Nagarathar-Vellalar (Dravidian) movement. A logical question could be asked "If you (Periyar, #drav) wanted to eradicate caste, why didn't you simply start at the bottom? Paraiyar, pallar, sakkiliar"?

There can be many answers, many of them non-malicious, and efficiency-related, but the reason why Periyar and #drav did was... they never bothered about caste-annihilation. That was a euphemism for the brahmin hate for the topmost tamil castes, and a flowery idea for politics. They just used it to rouse and invoke emotions. They didnt empower dalits because, then, the whole society would have discarded them, because the whole society is casteist.

Instead, they empowered the ones *just* above the dalits - chiefly, Vanniyar, Nadar.

In other words, they invested where they thought RoI would be highest. To deserve that empowerment, you needed to rattle the cages like anything, which vanniyar + nadar had been doing, for half a century before Dravidian Movement began. (and you needed to have numerical strength for that) They were clamoring for more space. The elites of tamil lands had been watching all this helplessly. They wanted to, but couldn't do anything to stop the empowerment that happened as a result of modernization.

So, instead of opposing, they did what Regenerative Braking does in automobiles. They slowed them down, and derived energy out that. This way, the goal of the project was to prolong their old privilege for as long as possible.

So, vanniyar+nadar had numerical strength, and were desirous of upward social mobility. The upper groups had no other choice but to accommodate them. Today's TN BJP is filled with those same groups that kept Dravidian Movement alive, plus the Goundars. Maybe I see some thevars too, but that's not the point.

The point is...the way tamil criminals are changing the narrative, and will continue to do so. They will bring the new narrative of Hindu vs anti-Hindu, and actively destroy the old narrative.

Brahmins of TN may think "but isn't that a good thing? Isn't that our objective? To make #drav, and Brahmin hate stop?"

Not for me. I was never worried about destroying the Dravidian Movement because it has to die anyways. Making the Brahmin hate stop was never my goal because I believe the worst is already over. My objective is to bring it out, and show it to the world. And then let them form opinions about what kind of people tamils, and Chettiar, Mudaliar, Pillai, are. It's complicated, and Im not saying it here. Just showing that hate to non-tamils is my goal and its the hardest part. India"

Im worried about Brahmin hate in TN first, and Hindutva, BJP, RSS, India, Hinduism, Congress next. Because none of them know my plight, and probably care about it too. Not only that, there is a great danger of outsiders completely misunderstanding the milieu in TN. Tamil criminals will not bother to impart correct understanding too. For ex, Tejasvi Surya says "We will destroy the anti-hindu Dravidian Movement, and bring hindutva/hinduism in TN".

Amul baby doesnt know what he's talking about. What does "destroying Dravidian Movement and planting the saffron flag in TN" mean? That's was senior journalist Mani is warning about.

Is it like the changing of guards at wagha border? agni satti out, thamarai in?

What is the change? Are we banishing the bandit/thief, and installing our policeman in the village? Nope.

The policeman *IS* the bandit, but non-tamils don't get this message. They are not aware that most of the pallis, saanans, konans, goundans who are active in TN BJP today are the very groups that helped keep Nagarathar-Vellalar (Dravidian) movement alive, and benefitted from it. There are 'breaking india' crackheads everywhere. They think a bunch of obscure, powerful anti-hindu people are running Dravidian Movement, and that hindus have to destroy them. Why don't Indians stop thinking in terms of mythology? Destroy the devil of Dravidian movement, and rescue the goddess of hinduism, and plant our good guys, the hindu tamils there, eh? Those hindu tamil monsters were the devils too. Dravidian movt and Brahmin hate was built and kept alive by the most hinduest of all tamils. India doesn't know this.

But this is what is being suggested all the time. Replace the bad guy 'A' with the good guy 'B'.

But what if A=B? What if...A was a bad guy all along, but now he finds that being bad is not going to be so profitable, and, more importantly, tolerated, and welcomed. Dravidian movement and its Brahmin hate lived for a century because palli, saanan, konan, goundan and tamils in general approved of it.

But now, the crowd is restless. #drav lived because tamils approved of it. #drav is in rocky waters because tamils don't approve of it whole heartedly now. Now, they want new toys. A, who was tolerated and hailed by tamils, is being criticized for being A. So, A undergoes personality changes to become B.

The criminal behavior here is... B too talks the language of India. As if A was a different person!!! 😂😆😅

India doesn't know, Tejasvi Surya doesn't know that A = B. But A, and the tamil crowd knows, right? This is how criminal they are, and this is my problem. Tamil crowd will start speaking of things differently. Different from how they were. They will bury their history entirely.

Just heard this podcast about Hindutva recently https://seenunseen.in/episodes/2019/4/8/episode-115-the-intellectual-foundations-of-hindutva/. I thought I'd post a short, separate post about this, but good that I got a chance now.

I think this can be taken as an official confirmation.

THERE ARE NO INTELLECTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF HINDUTVA!

70% of the talk is obsessed with muslims and islam, and the remaining % of the time when they discuss Golwalkar, Savarkar, etc, the anchor asks "But, Aakar, there is nothing here", and the interviewee laughs and says "Yes. Its the bitter truth". Something like that. Just one small interesting segment about organizational ability of Golwalkar and how he expanded RSS during the 30 yrs he led it. But nothing at all about intellectual foundations. Because there is none.

So, what is it that Senior Journalist Mani fears will enter TN? Hindutva is empty even in Nagpur. I have my own thoughts about that. To brahmins of TN who observe politics, it might seem like #drav is built on some ideology. On some solid ground. But observe closely.

They often say " 'திராவிடம்' என்பது ஒரு கருத்தியல். 'ஆரியம்' என்ற கருத்தியலுக்கான எதிர் கருத்தியல், எதிர்சொல்.

ஆரியம் = பார்ப்பனீயம் = பிறப்பிலேயே மனிதர்களை பிரிக்கும் வர்ணாசிரம கொள்கை + பெண் அடிமைத்தனம் தான் ஆரியம். பிறப்பில் அனைவரும் சமம், 'பிறப்பொக்கும் எல்லா உயிர்க்கும்' என்பது தான் திராவிடம். அனைவருக்கும் அனைத்தும் என்பது தான் சமூக நீதி, அது தான் திராவிடம்".

( "Dravidian movt is built on the ideology of Dravidianism, which is defined simply as the counter to Aryanism, which is the same as Brahminism. Dividing people at birth via varnashrama dharma + enslavement of women is aryanism. Saying everyone is equal + emancipation of women is dravidianism)

This is the ideology. The intellectual foundation of #drav. As you can see, they don't say "Im saying this. Im this."

They say "Im the opposite of whatever you say. HE SAYS X. And my ideology is 'anti-X' ".

They define themselves as the negative and counter of something they impress upon the crowd that the other person is saying.

So, the "other" is necessary for #drav act. The "other" is Brahmins, Brahminism, caste system, Aryanism, Hindutva, all put together. This is not really an ideology or an 'intellectual foundation'.

"Im the opposite of whatever you are" is not really an intellectual stand. It might seem solid, but that's because of lemuria. The unquestioning hordes of monkeys.

So, BJP thinks that its a matter of replacing the bad guy A with the good guy B, in TN. But I know, and tamil criminals know that A = B.

Neither A nor B have intellectual foundations. What is Senior Journalist Mani scared about?

"திராவிடம் விழுந்துவிட்டால் சாதி உள்ளே நுழைந்து விடும்" is an oft-repeated quote.

("If #drav falls, 'caste' will enter in again")

You can't appreciate this from the human world and human intellect. You have to enter the lemurian world, lemurian emotions and lemurian sense of things.

Is there no 'caste' now? Will caste come in only if #drav falls? Isn't it absurd? They will say "no no, things will become very very bad, like the old times. We put it in check. It is so much better now."

But, that "very very bad" of the old times was made so by the same vellala, chettiar, balija dogs who built Dravidian Movment! (+maravars, maybe)

They brought down their own casteism because they needed the service of the lower castes for their political movement. They needed labor. They realized that their old privilege and dominance was going to go. The people who had kept caste rigid for centuries, were the folks who built #drav, which says "all are equal at birth".

So, they took their own castesim several notches down. They made a show of fighting the "other", which was basically their own creation. The crowd doesn't ask. Because there is no incentive for saying the truth, and there are incentives for playing along the distorted, parallel reality of #drav.

So, now, when they warn, "if #drav falls, caste will come in", what do they mean? Its a warning to tamils. They say "If you discard the #drav movt that I built, I will drop my 'caste annihilation' drama, and become extremely casteist, like I was, in the old times".

A=B.

The police is the thief.

Senior Journalist Mani. Is he a mudaliar himself?

"என்னோட அரசியலை தூக்கி போட்டனா மறுபடியும் பழைய மாதிரி உன்னை மிதிக்க ஆரம்பிப்பேன்" னு தமிழர்களை மிரட்டுறானா?

What does it mean to say "TN will be saffronized?" Is there no casteism now? Will it go up? Who will be the cause of it? Hindutva/RSS/BJP? Or the goundans, pallis, saanans, who patronize them today? Or, will the mudaliars, agamudayars, chettiars, vellalas who ran #drav and DMK, become more casteist themselves, and then say "See. After these guys came, TN became more casteist. இதோ பார், நானே எவ்ளோ மோசமான சாதி வெறியனா மாறிட்டேன் பாரு, SLAAAAAAPPPP!!"??

சாதி வெறியையும் காமிச்சுக்கிட்டாச்சு, பாஜக வந்து தான் சாதியம் அதிகமாச்சுன்னும் சொல்லியாச்சு. Look at the beauty. The overall statement would be true. There was no/less casteism when #drav was there. TN became casteist again after it fell. Parpaneeyam, won. It was 2000 yrs old, after all. The teeny weeny detail that remains untold is. The very same guys who made the casteist society so, were the ones who held their casteism in suspension, during #drav. Whether it be elites, or the ones below them. A=B. A/B is weighing the pros and cons of being A/B according to the situation of the day. If there is market for the bad guy, he remains the bad guy, as A. If the tamil criminals start murmering too much about how bad A is, they discard the moustache and lungi, and put on khaki knickers and become sanghis/hindus-who-abhor #drav.

So, where does an "other" come in? It is a matter of your own casteism, Mr. Mani? Nobody is forcing or encouraging you to be casteist. Your own goundans and Nadars and Konars flocked to BJP. These same old shameless dogs kept #drav alive. Why do you never ever ever look at yourself, and blame your own guys for what they did?

Tamils are very smart this way. They pour hate on Brahmins/Hindutva/RSS for their own actions. You can refer to my previous post. This 'framing' of Brahmins, and raining down hate on them has been going on in TN in many many different forms for one hundred years. The post about 'anaithu sadhi archagar' (all-caste-priesthood) in this blog, is a good case study.

Leave alone the future hindutva in TN. The current and past hindutva itself has no great intellectual foundations. A few brahmins defending Mansusmriti or varnashrama doesnt keep caste system alive, nor did that create it. You are only exposing your own intellectual dishonesty by stating brahmins defending caste/manu/varna as the reason why casteism is rampant. So, in reality, you don't want to destroy/limit casteism, but only want to nitpick and corner Brahmins. This doesn't happen anywhere else in India in the way/scale/intensity it has been happening in TN.

Saying "if saffron comes into TN, it will become casteist and violent and regressive" is basically a casteist senior journalist Mani's warning to tamil people "We mudaliar/vellala/upper caste created #drav movt. We get gratification from seeing that our sociopolitical worldview is the basis for all politics in TN. Left or right. If you destroy my political worldview, I will punish you with my casteism. The casteism that my politics was opposing as actually from me only. I fought against the Brahmins for my own casteism. Yes. It was pure hate. If you end my politics, I will direct that hate at you."

A=B.

I just want to bring out this fact. A becoming B might end the brahmin hate, and that's what most brhamins in TN want, too, but the worst is already over. I want my revenge. Fuck Hinduism and fuck hindutva, which is basically nothing. India doesn't know tamil demons. I do, and I alone had to endure its hate. This is a fight for Brahmins of TN alone. They might have to antagonize BJP/RSS too, because tamils are jumping there, and Hindutva too needs popular support. If hindutva/India had to choose between losing Tamils and Tamilnadu to Christianity/China/Islam or other powers, and sympathising with tambrahm cause, which one do you think they will choose?

As the for the Hindutva being empty part. Maybe being empty is a good thing. J Krishnamurti said that truth is a pathless land and that organized religion is a crime. Many other thinkers have said that. Maybe its good this way. Also, I feel that parts of intellectual abstractions do exist in Indian thought.. Its just that those parts have not been sewn together into one large fabric, like #drav has done, in TN. #drav was smaller, and static, and engineered for lemurs. Hindutva might be more complex. Most of the content for #drav comes, after all, from general, public topics, which are contained in those parts. India has the parts. It needs to develop them, and stitch them together. Or, see the parts, and envision the whole, but refrain from stitching it into a whole. Let it be vague. If you define it, it becomes dumb and static like #drav.

A quote from that podcast about Hindutva (link above).

"The problem that hindutva faced was - How do you sell hinduism to hindus"?

Will try to read up more about the non-entity called 'Hindutva' and write about it, if I can. Hindutva reminds me of Ajativada.

"there is no creation, no jivas in it, no gods, no maya, no samsara, no liberation, no bondage. Its all false" 😂😄😆😏😂😂😂😂😅

உங்க கிட்ட போய் கேட்டேனே, என் புத்திய செருப்பால அடிக்கணும்.

If tamil criminals are going to change the 'frame', we need to isolate it, chronicle and connect their past, and hold them responsible for it.

Nakkeeran Prakash about Brahmin lobby in TN BJP

 I have been saying this in twitter for long, and I say it here too. Some things do not and have not and can not happen anywhere other than Tamil Nadu. Tamil demons in general, and Chettiar/Mudaliar/Pillai in particular, are demoniac, and inherently hateful and malicious like no other peoples on earth. This is a phenomenon unique to tamils.

There are lobbies of all castes everywhere, in all parties. The brahmin lobby in TN BJP is not the only one, nor the most powerful one. But the *way* he speaks, and slights and mocks in brahmin slang, and the suggests...this is unique to tamils.

"ava" means "them" in brahmin tamil and Chettiar/Vellalar have speaking of brahmins *in this manner*...this might seem like an ideological warfare its not. Its low level. It would be scorned in a civilized society, yet this is mainstream in Tamil Nadu...Chettiar/Vellalar have been painstakingly, meticulously, systematically feeding this Brahmin hate to the tamil psyche for one hundred plus years. And this "ava" slight has been popularized by them. The Brahmin hate of lay tamil people is from Nattukottai Chettiar, Mudaliar and Vellalar. 

This is much much more than politcs or social. This is pure hate and malice without reason or end. The manner in which it is done by this person, as well as in public media by tamils in general, speaks volumes about the tamils as a people. Annamalai's caste, Kongu Vellala Goundars, like all other tamils, played a role in it too. All tamils participated in Brahmin hate. This is beyond BJP or Congress or ADMK or DMK. All else in TN is built upon a substrate. India or BJP doesnt know this. I think Congress doesn't care. Tamil Nadu Congress has always been a Dravidian Party except for a few decades of the first half of 20th century.

He mockingly says Brahmins control everything in BJP, and even though Annamalai and L. Murugan have been given posts, they control everything, and they make these non-brahmins receive fire from the public, while they sit cozily in the background. The same was said even during an ex-pres, Tamizhisai's time.

Ironically, this statement "Brahmins send tamilisai to bear public outrage" was repeated many more times than the actual outrage on tamilisai.

BJP cadre all have roots in Dravidian Movement. They are acting to India and RSS, who don't know about Tamilnadu and Tamil people.

Those people in RW in TN, who are making show of opposing Dravidian movement, they are hand in glove with the Brahmin hate of the other group. Their brethren in #drav side. Normally, there is left and right everywhere, and it is not possible to say one caste is on one side only, though we could say so about dominance, in a certain time frame.

Say thakurs or kurmis are in both left and right. But thakurs on left wouldn't accuse kurmis of causing the ruin of the entire peoples of the state. In other places, the fight is political. Caste fights that become political will be political, and impersonal. They don't take that ugly form within the political stage, and they are not 1/10th as ugly within the caste stage itself, as they are in TN.

In tamil, the public political stage is filled with such venom-laced hate which is deeply personal and visceral. Tamils are a vile, demoniac horde.

The name of the show is "இங்கே அரசியல் பேசவும்" (You *must/can* talk politics here). There is a graphics of a board with this message that stands in front of a tea-shop that you can see in every street in TN.

I think the anchor/producers of the show probably got the idea from Ve. Mathimaran who used to say that he had set up a tea-shop in chennai in the 90's, and put such a board in front of his shop. Part of his speech deals exclusively with systematic Brahmin hate, and propaganda about Periyar, DMK, Karunanidhi and Dravidian Movement itself.

Want to know the castes of Ve. Mathimaran and Nakkeeran Gopal. Saw somewhere that gopal was nadar, but not confirmed. I have a doubt mathimaran could be vellala, may even be grandson of kuthoosi gurusami?

ஏண்டா நக்கீர நாயே உங்க நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர் (திராவிட) இயக்கம் "நாங்கள் 'பிராமணர்கள்' னு சொல்ல மாட்டோம், 'பார்ப்பனர்கள்' னு தான் சொல்லுவோம்"னு சொல்லுவானே, உனக்கு தெரியாதா?

Jeyamohan is Vellala

 and not nair. Actually, in deep south, I think they kind of fuse together. 

http://www.saivaneri.org/pillai_greats.htm

                                                       https://www.jeyamohan.in/about/

The vellalas, Nadars, Konars, Vanniyars, Mudaliar geniuses like Madan Ravichandran, claim, or want us to believe that they are opposing Nagarathar-Vellalar (Dravidian) movement in order to distance themselves from it. That is a well of malice and hate that is ugly. As more and more people get a glimpse of it, as the newer generations see what kind of monkey games have been played in lemuria for a century, it is becoming more and more embarrassing. Maybe JeMo is spinning his own local, tamilized, ilakkiyamayamakkappatta 'Breaking India' bullshit.

Somebody pls tell @zeneraalstuff and others on Twitter. JeMo is a vellala, and the vellala, and tamils in general, are burying their history.

I got blocked from twitter for speaking too many truths. I don't know if its permanent. Sethu poi melendhu pakura madhiri iruku. Ellam theriyudhu, aana intervene panni pesa mudiyala 😢

No probs. Twitter was never on my main plan. Its good in a way. Twitter sucked too much of my time and energy. I wouldn't have minded repeating many things many many more times there, but that alone won't do. It had only a limited role to play. Ellam nanmaikkey nu nenachukkanum...

Savukku Sankar

 Savukku Sankar is a vile son of ******* who spews venom on Brahmins continuously, but this vid was good.

Life is indeed cruel for a lot of people, and they show their frustrations back on various sections of the society. New respect for savukku. Kishore Swamy must learn from this.

பெரியார் மண்

There are 2 important things here.

First thing, he is baiting BJP/Brahmins by saying "lets see if BJP has the courage to place a Brahmin as head of TN BJP". Neither Brahmins, nor BJP should fall for it. Just a hypothetical situation, but a Brahmin as president of TN BJP is problematic in my view, considering today's scene. 

Today, there is some non-negligible support for BJP in TN. Most of the supporters are from the groups that had been active supporters of DMK, from, like, beginning.

DMK is so much more than just a political party in ways India does not understand. It is so with everything tamil. Its hard to explain to outsiders. Today, those groups are jumping over to BJP and attacking DMK and Dravidian legacies (ever so selectively, superficially). They are the ones who are neither upper castes in TN, nor lower castes. They are non-Brahmin, non-dalit, but non-influential castes. Dravidian movement was run by the uppermost elite non-Brahmins, for a century. The middle/low ones who are fighting it from BJP today know well that DMK was their home. 

By seemingly rallying for Hindutva, Hinduism, brahmins and attacking Dravidian movement for being "anti-Hindu" (which is wrong, but which is what India thinks), they are burying the real truths. They are the only ones who know and can speak the truths of Brahmin hatred in TN, but..by making it an imaginary hindu vs. anti-hindu fight, they are actually trying to bury truths. Because they too were involved. Its like an unpleasant part of their history they don't want to face. They want to kill it, deny it. 

Second, more important thing, is to see where this is coming from, not just the things he is saying! Tamil Brahmins have to know and see how Nattukottai Chettiars + Mudaliar + Pillai kept brahmin hatred alive in tamil minds for one hundred years. Non-stop. This is a unique phenomenon. This cannot happen anywhere else in the planet. The persistence of hatred, and the intensity, in tamil public sphere. A random sampling of tamils will not exhibit any significant Brahmin hatred, but...You have to see how Nagarathars + vellalars charged the crowd with their venom of hatred. Tamils are fully emotional creatures, and can be charged, as a crowd. This is a tribal thing. A "tamil public thought" which was filled with the most vitriolic hatred. Not like an explosion...but smoldering silently, for a century. Smoldering hatred, burning hot for one hundred years. How it affected and affects tamils "as a crowd". Nagarathar-Vellalar was present in the tamil mind, in the crowd. They charge the crowd, not individuals.

These millions of talks in public, these stage talks by tens of organizations for decade after decade...these keep alive a certain opinion-world in tamil public thought. A random tamil on the street might not hold significant Brahmin hatred, but Nagarathar-Vellalar venom and hatred lives in the minds of tamil crowds, and it is very very real. Tamil Brahmins have to see that. See the embers. See not only what he is saying, but where it is coming from. This is the group that fed its toxic hatred to tamils for one hundred years, generation after generation. This is the origin of Brahmin hatred in TN, not DMK or DK or Periyar. 

Nattukottai Nagarathar + Mudaliar + Pillai

அணைத்து சாதியினரும் அர்ச்சகர் a.k.a பெரியார் நெஞ்சில் தைத்த முள்

Ok, this post is only for people who have an introduction to 'Anaithu Sadhiyinarum Archagar (anybody can become a priest)' issue of the Dravidian movement, including the legal part.

What first caught my attention was the following portion from a speech by Sathyavel Muruganar, the agama-expert in the 2006 'Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal ... vs Govt. Of Tamil Nadu & Anr' case, at Periyar thidal...

(link for case - https://indiankanoon.org/doc/143215272/)

...specifically the part where he said "you can no longer fool us using the words 'convention and custom' from the agamas". He is celebrating Ranjan Gogoi's 2015 verdict.

Agamas are basically a kind of a loose rulebook for temples and public worship. They include, among other things, rules about what kinds of people can become priests in temples. Basically, the core of the case is that agamas say that a certain type of Brahmins alone can become priests in certain types of temples. This clause also comes under 'convention and customs' of agamas and worship, and Mr. Muruganar was referring to this part. These kinks about agamas are specific to TN. 

Some people wanted to change that, but the constitution protects the authority of the agamas. They want to change this rule that brahmins alone can become priests in big, agama-governed temples. But the law protects authority of the agamas, including this clause. They accuse Brahmins of resisting their moves.

The narrative, the thought-current over this is "the innermost part of the temple is the seat of the power and influence of the Brahmins. If we shake that, they lose their power, and casteism, which was introduced into society by Brahmins, will also get destroyed, or greatly weakened. Brahmins' influence will be gone if we remove them from there. That is why they are resisting this so much. They are taking all kinds of steps to stop us from doing this, moving levers through judiciary, bureaucracy, etc."

This is the story from outside, but there are many layers of unimaginable fraud.

But, seeing that video, my brain said "come on. YOUR Dravidian movement lists forming of a HRCE ministry as one of its great achievement. YOUR HRCE protected authority of agamas. Why are YOU celebrating victory of the law over this clause of the agamas?"

If getting அணைத்து சாதியினரும் அர்ச்சகர் (Anaithu Sadhiniyarum Archagar - priest from any caste. ASA) was your real motive, the first thing you must have done was to question the HRCE, and the Dravidian movement, which brought about the HRCE, and has been parading it as one of its great achievement. Anybody who wants ASA must have questioned HRCE Acts and Dravidian movement first. This is the logical step. But, they are sitting in the lap of Drav, and fighting against an imaginary enemy.

They are totally unfettered regarding lying or manipulating. They can go to any level. Sathyavel Muruganar says in this https://dheivamurasu.org/aagamangal-thadaiya/ blog that agamas are not an obstacle to ASA. I don't know how that works out. If agamas are not so particular about denomination of priests, then on what grounds are Brahmins appointed exclusively as priests?

If that is so, if there is no problem to begin with, in the first place! The fact that law protects aagamas, and aagamas oppose ASA is the heart of the problem.

The issue is that agamas are a loose rulebook, and can be interpreted in any way, and that we have to depend on people like Mr. Sathyavel Muruganar to tell us what's in them. 

Brahmins' appointment as priests comes under 'Convention and custom', and they are guarded by agamas. Agamas' sanctity and authority are upheld by HRCE acts, and this is protected by Articles 25/26 (freedom of religion) of the constitution.

You might think its 'the ones who want anybody to be a priest' versus 'the law'. Its not!!! Read on...

.

.

.

.

What Rajaji brought in 1954 was not at all குல கல்வி. That was a ploy of the Nadars+Periyar+DMK to oust Rajaji from CM post, and to install Kamaraj Nadar as CM. Nadars were near untouchables at the turn of the century, and were still low in social status in '50s. The powers that be of tamil lands - Chettiar, Mudaliar, Balija Naidu, used Pallis and Saanans (Vanniyar, Nadar), fully. The latter had good numerical strength. They were in greatest need for social mobility. They were just above dalits. 

Dravidam itself was simply a pact between these upper and lower groups. It was a quid pro quo. The powers would uplift vanniyar/nadar little by little, and the they would keep alive Nagarathar-Vellalars' cults of "Periyar" and "Dravidam". There was no point disproving it because the crowd had already decided whom and what to believe and follow. These are the political incentives.

What rajaji brought in 1952/53 was not at all குல கல்வி (hereditary education), but they made it look so, and this lie is actively kept alive till today. The saanans in BJP would not touch these areas of Dravidam. Periyar supported Communists in 1952 TN assembly elections. Then, in 1954, with his successful false campaign, he ousted Rajaji and erected Kamaraj as CM. Then, Periyar supported Kamaraj as CM candidate for 3 subsequent elections :- 1957, 1962, 1967.

Yes, in 1967, they year they say Dravidian rule began in TN, Periyar campaigned for INC/Kamaraj, against Anna/DMK!!

1952 TN Legislative Assembly Election Stands/Coalitions

1957 TN Legislative Assembly Election Stands/Coalitions

1962 TN Legislative Assembly Election Stands/Coalitions

1967 TN Legislative Assembly Election Stands/Coalitions

Those who see what I see will agree with me when I say "Dravidian rule begins in TN not in 1967, but in 1954!"

Nadars and Vanniyars abounded in INC, and DMK, and they had to face the oppression of vellalas/mudaliars like Bhaktavatsalam, in both places. Maybe, it was benign in DMK. Starting mid-1960's lots of Nadars started jumping to DMK, because Bhaktavatsalam had become CM. M.P.Sivagnanam and S.P.Adithan contested 1967 TN assembly elections under 'Rising Sun' symbol, which itself was got from the agni satti fellows in 1957.

After Anna died in feb 1969, there was a power struggle within DMK. Pallis and Saanans had provided the bulk numbers and support, but the leadership was mudaliar/vellala. Post Anna, they conspired to oust mudaliar leadership of DMK, or, cut into it. Karunanidhi was their mascot. Even today, you can observe this. Saanans and Pallis are very very intimate with their leader, Muthuvel Karunanidhi, because he was their man. Their assassin.

Periyar had been supporting Saanans all his life. That connection goes back to 1910's. They were the palanquin bearers of his personal legacy and cult.

In the power struggle within DMK, Periyar supported Saanans/Pallis, and their man, Karunanidhi. Periyar's allegiance shifted to DMK in 1969. He had not supported DMK once in his life while Annadurai was alive, and today's DMK claims to be the rightful children of Anna, Periyar and the Dravidian movement!

This was the time this drama, அணைத்து சாதியினரும் அர்ச்சகர் (ASA) was started by DMK government. 1969-70. Indira Gandhi had asked to prepone 1972 Assembly elections to '71, and DMK agreed. அணைத்து சாதியினரும் அர்ச்சகர் (ASA) was a stunt for the '71 elections, and also a kind of fireworks to mark Periyar's shift to DMK. Something big. 

Karunanidhi amended HRCE act in 1970. He won elections in 1971 not because of any of this, but because pallis and saanans had already jumped over to DMK en masse. When palanquin bearers jumped, the man in the palanquin dragged his palanquin to where they were, and put himself inside it again. No problem. Tughlaq magazine and Cho Ramasamy toiled in vain during 1971 elections. The field was already set. Periyar supported not Kamaraj, or INC from 1954 to 1969. He was supporting the caste called 'Nadar'. They were his personal slaves. New slaves. Udayan/Konan (like கருத்தாளர் Ve. Mathimaran, Asiriyar Veeramani) were old, centuries old slaves.

Periyar supported INC from 1954 to 1969, but supported DMK in 1971. Rajaji was ousted using a lie. He quit INC and started Congress Reform Committee (CRC) in 1957. Then, it became Swatantra Party, and this party sided with DMK in 1962 and 1967 elections. He saw what happened in 1969. In 1971 elections, Rajaji sided with INC/Kamaraj. Full swap.

1969-70 saw many changes,  many gear shifts. This was the time Karunanidhi ordered the first Backward Classes commission to study and create a report. Sattanathan/MBC-story starts from here, and it was done only by (K)DMK, not by the Mudaliars, who were the creators/executives of Dravidian movement.

Nagarathars-Vellalars were the main owners of the content and vitriol. Mudaliars were always the delavoys, even to the Naickers. The mudaliars/vellalas had never bothered about a backward classes commission. This was the period Karunanidhi called Periyar the 'Socrates of South East Asia', on behalf of UNESCO. Arcot Ramasamy Mudaliar, the brain of the Justice Party, and the creator of Periyar as an anti-caste reformer using stuff from Ambedkar, was the first President of United Nations Economic and Social Council, for his exemplary services to the crown. He helped it (the Crown) stab the Indian Freedom Struggle (anti-crown activities) in the back. Maybe the Mudaliars/Vellalars thought "UNஏ எங்களுது தான் டா. நாங்க தான் UN". I don't want to go into that. That needs full attention.

Karunanidhi amended HRCE in 1970 in preparation for 1971 election, as well as to mark Periyar's shift from INC to DMK. In 1972, after DMK won, 13 people challenged Karunanidhi's 1970 amendment. All 13, and Advocate General/pleader of DMK government, were all presumably Brahmins (not sure). I can understand the plaintiffs being Brahmin, but the judge/govt side pleader? What's going on? Can you see it? Did all of those Brahmins come forward of their own volition?

They said Agamas dictated that only people from "a certain denomination" can be priests in certain types of temples. So, to trample on agamas would be to trample on Freedom to practice religion which was protected by Article 25 & 26 of Indian Constitution. They said this stuff did not harm freedom of equality, etc, which was more important, and guarded by Articles 14-17 of the same, and successfully undid MK's amendment.

Now, Agamas are a religious, non-official text. A lot of stuff also written in the agamas are not followed. Dravidian Movement portrays HRCE laws and ministry as one of its important achievements. This starts from 1922/23. But point is...NONE OF THOSE LAWS SPOKE ABOUT அணைத்து சாதியினரும் அர்ச்சகர் (ASA)! They were all to do only with protecting property, and stuff like that.

Priests, etc was internal matter. Right from 1863, all internal affairs, customs and conventions were upto the 'Trustee'. The trustee was the supreme authority on all HRC institutions. I guess all trustees, ஆத்திகவாதிகள், are party to Dravidam's play. மாமன் மச்சானா இருப்பான். Chettiar/Mudaliar/Pillai.

To bring ASA, you have to do one simple thing. Just say that this one line, one rule, from the agamas, is invalid. Why didn't none of the HRCE laws from 1922/23 do it? HRCE Act 1959 actually protected these "codes, conventions and customs". This ASA itself enters into the scene only after 1969, and I gave you the background.

So, DMK quickly retracted its steps, or allowed Seshammal & Ors. to please undo their stunt of 1970 for 1971 elections.

 The next time ASA happened was in 2006. I think it was the first G.O./Amendment of DMK once it came to office. There was a game played here. Karunanidhi first issued an ordinance (அவசர சட்டம் ) with very strong wordings. Then, a G.O. was brought, and then, an amendment. But, the wordings in the actual amendment/act were very generic, it did not contain the aspects of ASA that the ordinance spoke about. But anyways, it was done with great fanfare and noise, as is always the case with #Drav.

This amendment was immediately (how?) challenged by a group. This time, it was done by a set of priests of some big temple in south (Adi Sivachariar Nala Sangam). The case went to high court, then, supreme court, then justice Ranjan Gogoi passed final judgement in 2015. I think the final judgement spoke something about a "case by case basis". Im not sure what that means. But the important point to note here is...all courts were passing judgements only on the final amendment. The strong wordings in the ordinance were dropped from the actual amendment that was made! I think the ordinance was presented to the judges as an additional document. The ordinance was redundant, but only the ordinance spoke about ASA! See the fraud...

In the first video, Mr. Muruganar says "Ranjan Gogoi asked 'why didn't you bring an amendment through assembly? Why did you pass an ordinance/G.O., etc?' ".

It is highly likely that Justice Gogoi had no clue that both the plaintiff and defendant were the same group and that there was a highly politicized game being played on the ground!! All they wanted was a *semblance of a real issue* in the court, a fight. The public was watching the court. Bringing ASA was never their intention!! If they wanted, they could bring it in no time. They are playing around with it.

Su.Arivukkarasu Nadar... Remember the quid-pro-quo? Nadars, vanniyars, konars, udayars kept alive the cults of Dravidam and Periyar. They were the crowd, and they had pre-decided whom to believe and follow. Dravidam could sustain so long because of this pre-decision of tamil crowd. It is in rocky waters today because the crowd no longer needs it. In TN, the crowd, the tamil people as a whole, is the biggest criminal.

Su.Arivukkarasu Nadar vaguely hinted something about an "out of court settlement" between Sivachariars who challenged DMK's amendment, and #drav. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bldqKjtezTw

Beyond this point its not very hard to guess what went on there. DMK got the sivachariar's first, before carrying out their stunt. They took one shadow step forward towards (ASA), then quickly arranged for it to be retraced, by a party they want us to think, are opposed to them. Both are orchestrated by #drav. The one step forward, and the blow from the *opposite* site that attacks this step. There needs to be some investigation about Seshammal and K. Parasaran & 11 Ors, of 1972, too. I guess they were all on #drav payroll, or, were brahmins who failed to see #drav's game.

The owners of #drav drama need caste and restrictions much much more than Brahmins. They were the ones who put up and maintained the fences, the hierarchy. They themselves made show of pulling these wall/fences down.  All you have to do for ASA is, call a small portion, one single clause of the agamas, as redundant. But they didn't do it, because ASA was not really their intention. Their intention was to make a lot of noise about opposing oppression, and to pour vitriol on the Brahmins.

The latter originates from those who own #dravidam, and one century of Brahmin hatred in TamilNadu - Nattukottai Nagarathars + Saiva Pillai + Sengundhar/Tuluva Vellala Mudaliar. That is the sole purpose of ASA. If there was an actual problem, it could have been solved long back. The situation is made more complex by pallis and saanans jumping over to BJP and attacking DMK/Periyar vaguely.

They have every right to go to whichever party/ideology they want, and sanskritize as much as they want. (did they have this right 100 yrs back. Who stopped them? Who enforced temple entry rules?) But, by themselves opposing #drav/Periyar for vague, petty reasons, they are robbing Brahmins of one thing. Of a crowd that can listen to the century old frauds. They are the tamil crowd. They have the bandwidth. The crowd is the greatest criminal in TN. அந்த பார்ப்பன வெறுப்பு விஷத்தை *கடந்து செல்வது* கொடுமையிலும் கொடுமை. அவர்களே இன்று திராவிட எதிர்ப்பு செய்வது தான் மிக பெரிய மோசடி. திராவிடி மோசடியில் தொடர்ச்சி தான் திராவிட எதிர்ப்பு மோசடி. 

Now, to whom can brahmins demonstrate the himalayan fraud after fraud after fraud after fraud in TN for a century? Only a very small sliver of the population in TN knows any little politics, and has the brain to connect all this. The larger crowd depends on the perspectives, opinions relayed by this small crowd. That small sliver in TN is biased. Biased either like the chettiars/vellalas in Drav side, or like the pallis and saanans and koundans in BJP mode today; Selective/biased hearing of crimes.

Another aspect of ASA is...TN is the only state in the whole country where texts like agamas have strict rules for temples. In other parts, anybody can touch the idol. TN is the only state with such agama-governed temples. The agamas were probably written by vellalas, fashioned after vedas and shastras, I guess. They were the ones who give so much importance to agamas.

'குடமுழுக்கு'  is a strictly tamil tradition. It was the vellalas/Nagarathars who translated this into "kumbabishegam", called Brahmins priests to do this, including sanskritic stuff. But it was also those very same Vellalas and Nattukottai Nagarathars who, on their Dravida stages, dipped the Brahmins in the acid of their vitriol, for dominating them with Sanskrit, and refusing to budge. 

நா உன் கைய புடிச்சுட்டு விட மாட்டேன் னு சொன்னா சரி. நீ என்ன கூட்டிட்டு வந்து, என் கைய புடிச்சு, அல்லது என்னை உன் கையை பிடிக்குமாறு கேட்டுக்கொண்டு, அந்த பக்கம் கூட்டத்துக்கிட்ட பொய் "இங்க பாருங்க என்ன எப்படி பிடிச்சு வெச்சுருக்கன் பாருங்க. விட மாட்டிங்கிறான், அடக்குறான், ஒடுக்குறான்" னு சொன்னா எப்படி இருக்கும்? Thats' what has been happening in TN.

இந்த கூட்டத்துக்கும் அறிவும் இல்லை, கண் பார்வையும் இல்லை. நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர் (திராவிட) அரசியல் சொல்வதை சொல்றத அப்பிடியே நம்புது. So, you have seen the legal, administrative stuff, the political background behind this drama of அணைத்து சாதியினரும் அர்ச்சகர். 

I can never enough convey the actual venom, the insidious intention, the dark and malicious hearts behind it, but I have showed you what is what. It is up to you now. குறிப்பிட்ட பிரிவினர் மட்டுமே அர்ச்சகராக இருக்க முடியும் என்று சொல்லும் ஆகமங்கள் தமிழகத்தில் மட்டுமே கடை பிடிக்க படுகின்றனர். ஆகமத்தை எழுதியது/புனிதமாக கருதுவது யார்? நாடகம் ஆடுவது யார்? You see for yourself.

***Epilogue***

In the olden days, there were more complex caste-wise rules. Nagarathar-Vellalar (Dravidian) propaganda and politics incited hatred agains Brahmins as the cause for all of that. I agree, but Brahmins were merely providing religious sanction to it, and they had no other choice. Who *needed* those rules? Studying legal cases about 1895/99 Ramnad riots, Sankaralinga Nadan case, and other cases can help understand the actual picture.

For ex- 

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/593155/ - 1916, rights of christian Vellala to build a wall in their church, to separate them from Nadar and Dalit Christians

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1055642/?type=print - 1961, Ettayapuram Zamin vs. Nadar

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1358352/ - 1913, Mudaliar vs. Nadar

There has been one century of fire in TN from one direction alone, one perspective alone- against the Brahmins. Temple entry rules were quite complex, and these were enforced and maintained by the landed castes. The extent to which a particular caste could go into a temple, and the various மரியாதை enjoyed by various castes in temples was a marker of the place and position of those castes in society. The hierarchy in society was simply reflected in the temple. The Brahmins were used to provide religious sanction only. "சாமியே சொல்லியிருக்கு".

For ex, you saw that video of Pazha Karuppiah above. Well, it turns out, a sect of Chettiars have been the primary patrons of that exact Chidambaram temple he is talking about!

Source - https://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%AE%AA%E0%AF%87%E0%AE%9A%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%9A%E0%AF%81:%E0%AE%9A%E0%AF%87%E0%AE%A9%E0%AF%88%E0%AE%A4%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%A4%E0%AE%B2%E0%AF%88%E0%AE%B5%E0%AE%B0%E0%AF%8D

They are the ones who put Brahmins inside their temples. Nattukottai Nagarathars are the most devout Hindus in TN, but also the creators of one century+ of the most visceral Brahmin hatred in tamil Nadu for one century. I don't know if Tamil Brahmins know and see this. Nagarathars and Vellalars are the source. And this 20th century phenomenon of Tamil Nadu, and tamil people as a whole, will go down in history of Human beings, as the farthest limit to which non-violent hatred can go. 

"You are anti-Hindu"

                                                                  (**கெட்ட வார்த்தைகள் உண்டு/profanity alert**)

If BJP comes to power in TN, or becomes the topic of debate, it may become 'Brahmins vs BJP'. I don't know about Brahmins vs. Hinduism.

மதன் ரவிச்சந்திரன் மாதிரி பொட்டுக்கட்டி முதலியார், நகரத்தார் தே பசங்க ஏதாவது வாய் புண்டை அடிப்பான் :

"என்ன டா. திராவிடத்தை, எங்களை 'இந்து விரோதி' னு சொன்ன...இன்னிக்கு நாங்களே 'இந்து மதம்' னு தான் டா பேசுறோம். இன்னிக்கு ஏன் எங்களை எதிர்க்கிற, நாங்க 'இந்து மதம்' பத்தி பேச கூடாதா?"

அதனால் அதை பற்றி என்னுடைய புரிதலை பகிறுகிறேன். நினைவிருக்கட்டும். செய்தவர்களுக்கு, நிகழ்த்திய நாட்டுக்கோட்டை நகரத்தார், செங்குந்தர்/துளுவ வெள்ளாள முதலியார், சைவ பிள்ளை, பலிஜாக்களுக்கு தெரியும். என்ன விஷயம் னு. ஆனா வெளிய சொல்றதை அப்படி சொல்லுவான். நக்கலாக இந்த கேள்விகளை நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர்களே கேட்பார்கள். மக்களும் அவர்கள் வெளியே சொல்வதை தான் விவாதிப்பார்கள். Brahmins' voice of truth will be drowned. This has always been the case in Tamil Nadu.

அப்படி தெரிஞ்சுட்டே, நக்கலா, tongue-in-cheekஆக அவர்கள் எதிர்காலத்தில் கேட்க கூடிய கேள்வி - " 'இந்து மதத்தை எதிர்க்கிறான்'னு சொன்ன. இன்னிக்கு நாங்களே இந்து மதத்தை தான் காப்பாத்த வந்திருக்கிறோம். எங்கே, உன்னை கானம்?" க்கு என் பதில் -

எப்பொழுதுமே...நாட்டுக்கோட்டை நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர் (திராவிட) அரசியல், கூற்றுகளுக்கு பதில் அளிக்க கூடாது! ஏனெனில் கேள்வி-பதில், உரையாடல், விவாதம் எங்கே நடக்கலாம் என்றால்...அடிப்படை நேர்மை (an earnest enquiry/debate) , விவாதம் செய்யும் விஷயங்களை பற்றி அடிப்படை புரிதல் இருக்கும் இடத்தில. நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர் (திராவிட) விவாதங்களில்...ஒன்னு விஷயம் தெரியாத, புரியாதவனா இருப்பான், அல்லது தெரிஞ்சுட்டே தெரியாத மாதிரி பேசுவான். நேர்மையான விவாதம் கிடையாது. Drav debate is always rigged.

ஆனால் அது ஒரு எழுப்பப்பட்ட, சராசரியான ஒரு நபர் மனதில் எழ கூடிய, ஒரு கேள்வி. அந்த கேள்வி பற்றி என் பார்வை. கேள்விக்கு அங்கே பதில் சொல்ல முடியவில்லை என்றாலும், ஒரு கேள்விக்கு பதில் தெரியாதவனா இருந்துவிட கூடாது. தெரிஞ்சுப்போம்.

தெரிஞ்சுட்டு நாட்டுக்கோட்டை செட்டி-முதலியார்-பிள்ளை நடத்திய, நடத்தும் நாடகத்தை பார்ப்போம். நம்மால் influence செய்ய முடியாது. பார்க்க தான் முடியும். அவன் யார் என்று மக்களுக்கு சொல்ல முடியாது என்றாலும், at least நம்மளாவது தெரிஞ்சுக்கணும். வார்த்தைகளுக்கு அவர்கள் எந்த மாதிரியான அர்த்தம் குடுத்து வைத்திருந்தார்கள், நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர் (திராவிட) அரசியலில் உண்மையாக என்ன நடந்தது...இதை பற்றி என் புரிதல் :-

முதலில். இந்தியா/பாஜக/ஆர்.எஸ்.எஸ். பேசுவது இந்து மதம் vs.வேறு மதம், இந்துதுவா vs.மதசார்பின்மை. 

தமிழகத்தில் 108 ஆண்டுகளாக நடந்து கொண்டிருக்கும் அரசியல்/narrative - பார்ப்பனர்-பார்ப்பனரல்லாதார்!!

இரண்டிற்கும் "ஒரு மலைக்கும் மடுவுக்குமான வேறுபாடு உண்டு".

இந்தியாவின் இடது/வலது சாரி விவாதத்தில், தங்களை மேல் சாதி என்று கருதிக்கொண்டிருப்பவர்கள் ஒரு புறம் அதிகமாக, ஆதிக்கும் செலுத்தும் கூட்டமாக *இருக்கலாம்*. இல்லாமலும் போகலாம். ஆனால் அந்த விவாதம், அந்த அரசியல் எல்லாருக்கும் பொதுவானது. Horizontal division. This is a most important difference between tamil country and India. Nowhere else in India is/was the narrative 'one caste vs other', leave alone 'one caste vs rest of the society'. Tamil society is a unique place.

இந்தியாவின் விவாதம் எல்லாருக்கும் பொது. ஆனா தமிழ்நாட்டு விவாதம் ...சாதி முறை பற்றி அவர்கள் பேசுவார்களே, அது போல vertialஆக, ஒரு சாதியையே தள்ளி வைத்து, அதன் மீதி விஷம் உமிழ்ந்த "விவாதம்". Vertical division.

ஒரு முக்கியமான விஷயம். இது "விவாதத்தை" குறிக்கும். நிஜ வாழ்க்கை, யதார்த்தத்தை அல்ல. தமிழகத்தில் பார்ப்பனர்-பார்ப்பனரல்லாதார் என்ற "விவாதம்" நடந்தது. உண்மையில் இரண்டு குழுக்களுக்கும் இடையிலான சண்டை இல்லை. We were never invited to debate. அந்த அரசியல் விவாதம், அப்படி இருந்தது. இந்தியாவில் இடது/வலது க்கும் கொள்கை முரண். 

India's debate was horizontal, TN's one hundred year old "debate" was vertical. This is the main difference. They are suddenly seeing TN through Indian perspective, which is different. 

"இந்து, இந்து விரோதி" என்ற விவாதம் தமிழகத்தில் நடந்திருந்தால், பார்ப்பனர்கள் சார்பு எடுத்திருப்பார்கள். ஆனால் தமிழ்நாட்டு மிருகங்கள் செய்து வந்திருப்பது  - வெறும் பார்ப்பன வெறுப்பை உமிழ்வது. "எதிர்க்க" கூட இல்லை. வெறும் விஷம் உமிழ்வது. எப்படி னா...

நீங்க bus stopல busக்கு காத்துட்டு இருக்கீங்க. ஆட்கள் நடந்து போய்ட்ருக்கான். திடீருன்னு ஒரு ஆள் உங்களை பாத்து, நின்னுடுறான். நின்னு உங்கள கோவம் வெடிக்க கத்து கத்து னு கத்தி அசிங்க அசிங்கமா திட்டுறான். தொடர்ந்து கோவம் வெடிக்க உங்களை பாத்து கத்திட்டே இருக்கான். நீங்க என்ன பண்ணுவீங்க? என்ன பண்ண முடியும்? அந்த ஆள் கிட்ட போயிட்டு "இங்க பாரு பா, என்ன பிரச்சனை உனக்கு? நமக்குள்ள ஒரு பிரச்சனையும் இல்லையே? உனக்கு ஏன் இவ்ளோ வன்மம்"னு கேட்பீர்களா?

தமிழ் மண்ணில் "திராவிடம்", "பெரியார்" ஆகிய பிம்பங்களை உருவாக்கி, மற்ற வன்னியர், நாடார், கோனார், உடையர்களுக்கு கற்று தந்த நாட்டுக்கோட்டை நகரத்தார், சைவ பிள்ளை, துளுவ வெள்ளாள முதலியார், செங்குந்தர் முதலியார், பலிஜா நாயுடுவுக்கு... பார்ப்பனர்களிடம் "தீர்க்க கூடிய பிரச்சினை" ஒன்றுமே இல்லை.  There is no actual issue. If there was one, it could have been solved. அவர்கள் வெறுப்பு காரணம் இல்லாத வெறுப்பு. Hatred without reason. நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளரில் நெஞ்சில் இருக்கும் வெறுப்பு, வன்மம், விஷம்....அளவில்லா வினை - கரணம் இல்லாத வெறுப்பு. 

"ஏதோ ஒரு பிரச்சினை" இருந்து, அது தீர்ந்துட்டா வெறுப்பு போகும். இது அப்படி இல்லை. சாதாரணமா மனித சமூகத்தில் அப்படி தான். ஏதோ ஒரு விஷயத்துக்காக வெறுப்பு. ஏதோ ஒரு பிரச்சினை. அது சரியாகி விட்டால் அந்த வெறுப்பு, பிரச்சினை இல்லை. ஆனா நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளரின் பார்ப்பன வெறுப்பு விஷம் அப்படியில்லை. அந்த அளவில்லா வெறுப்பு விஷ ஊற்று - காரணமற்றது. Hatred without reason. They are still walking ovens of malice, venom and hatred. You can see it. ஒரு நூறாண்டு அந்த விஷத்தை ஆசை தீர உமிழ்ந்து, தமிழக மக்களுக்கு அந்த விஷத்தை ஊட்டி, நெஞ்சில் இருக்கும் நெருப்பு தனலை கொஞ்சம் ஆற விட்டு கொண்டார்கள். 

உலகத்தில் எங்கே,எந்த கட்சியா இருந்தாலும், ஏதோ ஒரு அரசியல், பிரச்சாரம் பண்ணியகனும். அந்த routine-politics-that-everybody-has-to-doஐ தவிர, நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர் அரசியலில், பிரச்சாரத்தில், சமூக பார்வையில் இருக்கும் ஒரே விஷயம் - அவர்கள் இதயத்தில் பார்ப்பனர்கள் மேல் இருக்கும் அளவில்லா விஷம், வன்மம்.

அந்த விஷத்தை கொட்டி தீர்க்க தான் திராவிட நாடகம். அந்த நாடகத்தில் ஒரு நல்ல உதாரணமாக இருக்கும் காட்சி - "அணைத்து சாதியினரும் அர்ச்சகர்".  நிஜமா ஒரு பிரச்சினை இருந்து, அதை தீர்த்துவிட்டால், நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளருக்கு பாப்பானை வசைபாட ஒரு நல்ல காரணம் இல்லாமல் போய்விடும் ல. அதான். அந்த பிரச்சினையை openஆக விட்டு வைத்திருக்கிறான்.

அந்த காரணமில்லா அளவில்லா வெறுப்பு ஏன் வந்தது, அதன் பின்னணி என்ன, உண்மையில் என்ன காரணம் என்று ஓரளவுக்கு எனக்கு idea இருக்கு. ஆனா அதை சொல்ல இந்த கட்டுரை பத்தாது.  Will write about it.

ஆக. நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர் "நாங்கள் இந்து மதத்தை எதிர்க்கிறோம்" னு சொல்லி அதுக்கு சொன்ன காரணம். "இந்து மதம் தான் எங்களை இழிவு படுத்துகிறது. இந்து மதம் தான் எங்களை சூத்திரனாக்கியது. இந்து மதம் தான் எங்களை சாதிகளாக பிரித்து வைத்தது.".

இந்து மதம் ஒரு ஆள் இல்லை. அதுக்கு வாய் இல்லை. அது நாட்டுக்கோட்டை செட்டியாரை கூப்டு "போடா தேவிடியா பையா" னு சொல்லவில்லை. 

அந்த "இந்து மத வேதம், புராணம், மடம்" எல்லாத்தையும் பல நூற்றாண்டுகளாக பாதுகாத்து வருவதே...இந்து மத எதிர்ப்பு பேசும் திராவிட அரசியலை உருவாக்கிய நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர்-நாயுடு தான்! அங்கே உண்மையில் இருப்பது வெறுப்பு, வினை மட்டும் தான்.

சாதி என்பது கள நிலவரம். Lived reality. இந்து மதம் என்பது ஒரு சித்தாந்தம், சில என்ன ஓட்டங்கள் தொகுப்பு. Ideologies, philosophies. ஒருவன் எழுதி வைப்பது கள உண்மை ஆகி விடாது. அப்படி ஆகிவிட்டாலும், எழுதி வைத்தது மட்டும் காரணம் இல்லை. What is written did not magically become reality.

"சாதியை உருவாக்கியது இந்து மதம்" என்று சொல்வது தவறு. நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர் (திராவிட) அரசியல் அப்படி சொன்னதுக்கு காரணம்- பார்ப்பன வெறுப்பு. பார்ப்பான் மீது இருக்கும் வெறுப்பை தீர்த்துக்கொள்ள, அந்த வெறுப்புக்கு ஒரு முலாம் பூசுவது. "நாங்கள பாப்பானை எதிர்க்கல, சாதி அமைப்பின் அஸ்திவாரத்தை தகர்கிறோம், அது அங்கே தான் இருக்கு" னு சொல்றது. 

அவர்கள் இந்து விரோதி என்று சொல்லிக்கொண்டது - இந்து மதம் தான் சாதியை, அவர்கள் இழிவை உருவாக்கியது என்பதால். ஆனால் அது தவறு. இந்து மதம் சாதியை "உருவாக்கவில்லை".  It's not a cause-effect relationship between Hinduism and caste system. அவர்கள் வெறுமனே வாயால் பேசிய கூற்று அப்படி. அவர்கள் அரசியலுக்கு அவர்கள் தந்த அடையாளம் அப்படி. ஆனால், முன்னே சொன்னது போல, நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர் (திராவிட) அரசியலின் ஒரே எண்ணம் - நெஞ்சில் இருக்கும் பார்ப்பன வெறுப்பு தணலை ஆற்றிக்கொள்வது.

உண்மையில், யதார்த்தத்தில், அவர்கள் இந்து மதத்துக்கு மட்டும் இல்லை, அவர்கள் மற்ற எல்லாத்தையும் எதிர்பதற்கு காரணமாக இருக்கும் 'சாதி'க்கே அவர்கள் எதிரானவர்கள் இல்லை!! Their "anti-hindu, anti-caste" were both a euphemism for "anti-Brahmin". And this is unique to tamils in human society. "Anti-Brahmin" doesn't mean they will have nothing to do with Brahmins. It simply means exploding with hatred for the Brahmins. Just that. Venting out deep hatred and vitriol, but continue to endure and imbibe Brahmins/Brahminism.

அவர்கள் "நாங்கள் இந்து மதத்துக்கு எதிரானவர்கள்" னு சொன்னது பொய், வெறும் வாய். பார்ப்பனர்கள், நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர்களை, அவர்கள் ஊட்டிய விஷத்தை உட்கொண்டு தங்கள் மீது விஷம் உமிழ்ந்த வன்னியர், நாடார், கோனார், etc அவர்களின் திராவிட அரசியலை பார்த்து "நீங்கள் இந்து மதத்துக்கு விரோதி" என்று சொன்னது...புரியாமல் சொன்னது.

"என்னை அடிக்காதே, என் மீது வெறுப்பு விஷத்தை உமிழாதே" என்பதை "இந்து மதத்தை எதிர்கிறாய்" னு சொல்லிட்டாங்க, ஏனெனில் பார்ப்பனர்களுக்கு பெரும்பாலும் இன்று கூட தமிழகத்தில் என்ன நடக்குது, என்ன நடந்து வந்திருக்கிறது னு தெரியல. அவர்கள் இந்தியாவின் கண்ணோட்டத்தில், perspectiveல் தமிழகத்தை பார்க்கிறார்கள். But 20th century Tamil Nadu and tamils were totally different. They are in a league of their own. It is incorrect to apply Indian stereotypes, framework and perspectives to Tamil Nadu.

So, நாளைக்கே...வன்னியர், நாடார், கோனார், கவுண்டர், எல்லாரும் திராவிட பல்லக்கை விட்டு, பாஜக/இந்துத்துவா மாறிட்டு, பார்ப்பனர்களை பார்த்து "ஏன்டா, இன்று நானும் இந்து மதத்தை காப்பாத்துறேன், இன்று என்னை எதிர்கிறாய், அல்லது என்கூட வர மறுக்கிறாய் என்றால், உனக்கு உண்மையில் இந்து மதம் பற்றி அக்கறை இல்லை என்று தானே பொருள்?" என்று கேட்டால்...

தமிழ் பிராமணர்களே அதுக்கு பதில் அளிக்காதீர்கள். அது ஏதோ சொல்லிட்டு போகட்டும். அது கிட்ட பேச முடியாது. ஆனால் நீங்கள் தெரிந்து கொள்ளுங்கள். உண்மையிலேயே இந்து மதத்துக்கு எதிரியாக இஸ்லாம், அல்லது கிருஸ்துவம், அல்லது வேற ஏதோ ஒன்னு வெளி நாடுகளிலிருந்து படையெடுத்து வந்தால், பார்ப்பனர்கள் உட்பட, அந்த பிரச்சினை எல்லாருக்கும் பொதுவானது.

ஆனால். இது நாடகம். இது தமிழர்களின் திராவிட நாடகம் போல் ஒரு புது நாடகம். "திராவிடம் இந்து விரோதி" என்று இத்தனை நாள் பார்ப்பனர்கள் சொன்னது - புரியாமல், தெரியாமல் சொன்னது.

"நாங்கள் இந்து மதத்தை எதிர்க்கிறோம்" என்று நகரத்தார்-வெள்ளாளர் (திராவிட) அரசியல் சொன்னது பொய்.

It was very very idiotic of Brahmins to invoke the 'anti-hindu' line of attack to counter nagarathar-vellalar (dravidian) movement. I won't go too hard on Brahmins. Tamil is a unique race, a unique society. They called the 'anti-hindu' out of a sense of exasperation and desperation. 

But then, *Brahmins* calling Nagarathar-Vellalar (dravidian) movement as 'anti-hindu' is not completely unjustified. Because, in any case, Dravidian Movement has been saying right from the start that 'there is no such thing as hinduism. What is called as Hinduism today is only Brahminism.'

So, going by that framework, which was the framework of tamil socio-politics for a century, *Brahmins* calling them anti-hindu is not unjustified, because, according to that framework itself, anti-brahmin = anti-hindu.

But today's palli, saanan, konan, gavundan of TN BJP calling them anti-hindu is wrong. It is a game. They r the very ex-soldiers and chief beneficiaries of Dravidian Movement.

அவர்கள் இந்து விரோத போக்கை (வெறும் வாயில்) எடுத்த காரணம் அவர்கள் சாதி-விரோதி என்பதாலாம். உண்மையில், அந்த மேடைக்கு வெளியே அவர்கள் சாதி, இந்து மதம், பார்ப்பனீயம், எதற்குமே விரோதி இல்லை. சும்மா சீண்டுறான். Ignore. 🙏